ILSE
KIND 






2025





Human Enough




 
Title    Crouching (0.44), Covering torso(0.52), Sad(0.23), Nudity likelihood (0.61) 
Year     2026
Medium   Clay, Camera, Pose estimation algorithm, classification pipeline, projector
Size     80 x 65 x 40 cm














    People have long been reduced to their bodies to be read. Their proportions, form, and surface  measured and sorted into categories. Today, this practice persists digitally with computer vision, based on hidden, post-anatomical codes. In response, Kind hands part of her artistic agency to computer vision in the studio. Working under continuous camera observation, Kind shapes wet clay by hand in dialogue with algorithmic feedback. This feedback loop between hand and computer vision continues, until the system persistently detects a human body; a ‘false positive’. At that point, the form is finished, materializing the threshold where the sculpture is ‘human enough’ to the machine, ready for classification: Crouching(0.44), Covering torso(0.52), Sad(0.23), Nudity likelihood(0.61).    
 
The question of what counts as human has been used to justify social hierarchy and dehumanisation, underwriting slavery and eugenic policies. Such codes were actively carried and legitimised through art. People have long shaped themselves toward the standards these systems set. Today, computer vision automate and hides the measurement and makes optimisation continuous and inescapable. Their false positives make undeniable what is true of every human detection; that the system has no aperture for what lies inside the measurements it confirms.

The resulting figure is crouched low, folded inward and faceless. Its surface comes to life under the machine’s gaze; skeletal diagrams of lines and joints measure the body beneath. Some align perfectly; others drift or disappear. The body returns to mute materiality when that gaze withdraws, reopening it to human interpretation.




















2025





Test Tiles





Sculptures 
Title    Test tiles
Year     2025
Material Clay, Copper Sulfate, Racomitrium microcarpon, Borax, Slime mould
Size     17 x 17 x 9 cm
 
Sound installation
Title    How to read character in the face and to detemine the capacity for love, business or crime

Year     2025
Material Book: Physiognomy by Leila Holt 1864,  Text-to-speech algorithm, Bone conduction speaker, Aluminium
Duration 8:31 minutes






















     Traditionally, test tiles are part of the artistic act of measuring, comparing, and selecting, that usually remains invisible. They are tools of judgment in the studio, determining what material is deemed worthy of the final public piece. Kind replaces these tiles with ears, applying the logic of test tiles to the human body.

Ears carry a long scientific history of being read to define a persons’ character, intelligence and moral worth. Till today, ears remain an identifyer in biometric surveillance systems now automated. Kind stages this continuity by matching the test tiles-as-ears with an 18th-century physiognomy manual read aloud by a child’s voice; a pseudoscience that claimed to define meaning from an ear’s size, countour, folds, helix, lobe, antitragus, angle and color. 

Read together, the tiles and the recitation expose how easily subjective judgment is dressed up as procedure, conditions that allow such logics to become instruments for political and ideological control. 
























2025






Form Under Observation





Sculpture
Title     ‘Crouching (0.44), Covering torso(0.52) Sad(0.23), Nudity likelihood (0.61)
Year      2025
Material  Wet clay, Camera, pose classification pipeline
Size      80 x 65 x 40 cm
 
Surveillance view  
Title   ‘False positive’
Year     2025
Material Human detection pipeline, Aluminium, Ipad, Camera
Size     29 x 11 x 5 cm









    While the artist’s studio is often imagined as a private, self-contained space of creative freedom, Kind’s studio setup shows it as infiltrated by historical and contemporary systems of judgment.

From classical canons of proportion and physiognomy to algorithmic social media platforms and surveillance systems, bodies and artworks are  continuously measured, classified, and evaluated. In this context, Kind deliberately hands part of her agency to technologies of control. She modifies gestures, forms, and compositions to align with prevailing attention regimes. 




















2024





Lifetime Approval Rate 96%  







Video  
Title    Lifetime Approval Rate 96%
Year     2024
Material Behind-the-scenes documentation of the artist performing a data annotation task, with simultaneous heartbeat monitoring, LAION-5B Training Database
Specs    Full HD, stereo sound
Sound    MYNGRY 
Duration 7:25 minutes 

Sculpture 
Title    Hand 21

Year     2023
Material Silicone, Mechanics and electronics
Size     23 x 17 x 9 cm 


Sculpture
Title    Hand 41

Year     2024
Material Silicone
Size     23 x 20 x 10 cm


Sculpture
Title    Hand 71

Year     2024
Material Silicone
Size     29 x 11 x 5 cm


Sculpture
Title    Hand 14

Year     2023
Material Silicone, Mechanics and electronics
Size     21 x 18 x 8 cm





















    Perched atop the mountain’s summit, where humanity has long sought to touch the divine, the exhibition dismantles the myth of Artificial Intelligence as an autonomous force. 

Ilse Kind's work emerges from her own experience in the hidden workforce of artificial intelligence as an annotation worker; an unacknowledged role in which humans label and evaluate data to train and maintain AI systems under unpredictable, repetitive and underpaid circumstances.

At the center of the exhibition, the video Lifetime Approval Rate 96% presents a full-length Human Intelligence Task. Its title refers to the score that evaluates workers’ performance. Precisely instructed, closely monitored and bound by confidentiality, Kind captured what was allowed: the clicks of her hand on the trackpad and the rhythm of her heartbeat as she worked. These sound recordings were made into a soundscape by MYNRGY, amplifying the bodily rhythms of digital labor that usually remain unheard.

On screen, repetitive trackpad clicks annotate training data. The original data is substituted with a leaked training database, used to train AI models in generating images of hands. Medical photographs collide with artist drawings, miniature army figures, and cowboy toys. Fed with this material, AI falters most visibly in its attempts to recreate the human hand; producing distorted, anatomically flawed gestures.

The AI-generated output of the same model trained on this database take sculptural form in Click 14, Click 21, Click 45, and Click 71. Modeled with Kind’s own annotating hands and assembled through the logic of diffusion algorithms, the works collapse boundaries between human and machine, digital process and physical form. Failures that signal to AI’s lifeline of human judgment, selection, and correction. 


[Accompanying essay ’Handwerker; a human resource farm’ on request ︎]


Teaser


















2024





Happiness Machine






Installation
 Title ‘Happiness machine’
Material [Pose-landmark detection system, Camera, Aluminium,
Irrigation nozzle, Tube, Water]
Size
110 x 110 x 150 cm
Year 
2024
  
Sculpture
Title ‘BLOB #2’
Material [Wet Clay]
  Size 90 x 70 x 60 cm
Year 
2024

















Surveillance systems track how we move and express, while moulding us into simplified, predefined forms. These systems prioritize basic emotional states, fueling emotions like happiness. Treated as malleable data containers; BLOBs (Binary Large Objects), we are reduced to the data we produce or lack. Simplified to analyzable shapes, we are left with only the most basic expressive features. 

In this installation, the clay sculpture embodies this condition. Shaped in a predefined "happy" pose to satisfy the pose recognition system, its survival depends on water. A feedback mechanism irrigates only when its form aligns with the algorithm's expectations. Yet, this act of validation meant to preserve, gradually strips it of its identity. Too much water risks dissolution, softening the figure, while too little causes it to dry out and crumbles away, returning back to soil. Here, the act of being seen becomes both a lifeline and a form of erasure, caught between becoming and being in systems that prize visibility over human complexity.  



Teaser



















2022





Our Mind as a Host 


Video Installation
Title ‘Our Mind as a Host’
Material [Database: 1866 images, 321 sounds of parasites
and surveillance technologies]
Size
750 x 300 cm
Year
2022
  























 
    Our Mind as a Host explores the overlap between parasites and surveillance systems, revealing them as new species that feed on human bodies, behavior, and perception. The viewer becomes the host for the works’ parasitic form, a subject of manipulation rather than a passive observer.

‘‘New species are entering our world and living at our expense. As parasites, hidden surveillance technologies are preying and feeding on us. When they find a weak spot, their biometric algorithms crawl under our skin without consent. They modify behavior, interpret and maybe even shape one’s being, often without us noticing.’’

Drawing on a hand-assembled archive of 1,866 images and 321 sound samples, Our Mind as a Host forges a taxonomy of control. It compares the form and behavior of parasites and surveillance technologies, from facial recognition cameras to biometric sensors.

The result is a psychovisual experiment: an a-rhytmic fast-moving montage in which image pairs are arranged by mental association, controling the viewers eye over the screen. Just as surveillance and parasites can reshape behavior, Our Mind as a Host manipulates the viewer’s perception, producing a “third image” in the brain, and using our mind as a host.




Documentation video